Adirondack Forum  
Rules Membership Donations and Online Store Adkhighpeaks Foundation ADKhighpeaks Forums ADKhighpeaks Wiki Disclaimer

Go Back   Adirondack Forum > The Adirondack Forum > Adirondack Wildlife
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-28-2016, 10:56 AM   #121
Buckladd
Member
 
Buckladd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Hogtown
Posts: 684
My idea of a "compromise" would be to allow sportsmen (hunters/trappers/anglers) floatplane access to the interior of the Adirondacks (yes, Wilderness areas) during the trout and big game seasons. As for Glacier, I've been there and having mule deer eat out of my hand isn't exactly a "wild" experience.

In Mr. Dweller's vision if I'm tracking a buck in the Wilcox Lake Wild Forest and it goes over to the Siamese Ponds Wilderness I'd have to give up the track. Not only is that a bunch of crap but it's also discrimination. There's a few users of the Forest Preserve I prefer not to encounter but they have as much of a right to be there as I and we must tolerate each other.

As for thinking you'd see more wildlife if more predators were hunting them instead of humans; you are in Disneyland. In the past two decades coyotes have become more prevalent in all three of my main Adirondack hunting areas. I'm still successful at finding deer, but I have to work to see them as they are more skittish then ever. Even the deer around my home do not come out into the open the way they used to and fawn recruitement is way down. So, be careful what you wish for.

The Adirondacks are not perfect, but I'll take them the way they are and I see all kinds of wildlife (deer, bear, turkey, coyotes, fox, fisher, marten, mink, eagles) all year long; especially during hunting season. The only thing I rarely encounter are bobcats, but they are there. Perhaps you should work on your woodsmanship skills if you want to see more wildlife.
Buckladd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2016, 11:03 AM   #122
forest dweller
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 529
They have roads in national parks...yes, enough to give you some access, but the backcountry is protected AS wilderness - EVEN MORE SO than actual designated wilderness on national forest land or BLM land, where they allow hunting. I PREFER the backcountry in national parks because to me that is MORE pure wilderness...you're not allowed to kill the things that live there. And YES I know that Wrangell St Elias is a preserve AND a park - but at least they have PARK (no hunting) and PRESERVE (hunting allowed primarily because there aren't too many supermarkets around to by beef).

The Adironacks should have both also. I know this is new thinking and new thinking scares old conformist authoritarians, especially if they are biased and like doing something somebody else thinks we ought to stop doing...but you're a big boy and should be able to think outside the box.
forest dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2016, 11:11 AM   #123
montcalm
Mobster
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 696
I'm not a hunter or angler... but I have to think of it from this perspective.

If I was living a somewhat simple, subsistence-based life as some do in more remote areas, the Adirondacks being a prime example in the east, I would hunt and eat meat. Why? There aren't exactly supermarkets everywhere and why put more strain on the rest of the world and their meat production industry (which don't even get me started) when you could eat the most natural meat known to man. Also it's just way, way cheaper.

Again, why are we protecting deer and not the moss? Seems arbitrary. If the deer populations are not so low as to threaten the population, its really no different. Except somehow it is?
montcalm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2016, 11:15 AM   #124
montcalm
Mobster
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 696
Quote:
Originally Posted by forest dweller View Post
They have roads in national parks...yes, enough to give you some access, but the backcountry is protected AS wilderness - EVEN MORE SO than actual designated wilderness on national forest land or BLM land, where they allow hunting. I PREFER the backcountry in national parks because to me that is MORE pure wilderness...you're not allowed to kill the things that live there.
So adding roads that fragment the animal populations but allows YOU more access is OK, but hunting is not?
montcalm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2016, 11:22 AM   #125
forest dweller
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckladd View Post
As for Glacier, I've been there and having mule deer eat out of my hand isn't exactly a "wild" experience.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckladd View Post
As for thinking you'd see more wildlife if more predators were hunting them instead of humans; you are in Disneyland.
You may not realize it but you did in fact just contradict yourself.
forest dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2016, 11:23 AM   #126
forest dweller
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 529
Quote:
Originally Posted by montcalm View Post
So adding roads that fragment the animal populations but allows YOU more access is OK, but hunting is not?
Nobody would accept zero roads in parks, you put a minimum amount in to get some reasonable access.

And yes, lots of hunters kill more wildlife than a FEW roads do.

Combine the two, animals accidentally killed by cars and animals deliberately killed by people and it is probably an unacceptable amount...to people that don't like animals being killed.
forest dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2016, 12:00 PM   #127
montcalm
Mobster
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 696
Still avoiding my other questions... but I suppose that's just for YOUR convenience.

One glaring fact: People hunted these lands long before there were ever roads and when they were in fact true wilderness.

Just because you don't like hunting, doesn't mean it doesn't have a place in Wilderness lands.

I'm not sure for the reasons why hunting is limited in NPs, but I tend to think it is more along the lines of human motivation i.e. tourism rather than actual wildlife conservation.
montcalm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2016, 12:05 PM   #128
Buckladd
Member
 
Buckladd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Hogtown
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by forest dweller View Post
You may not realize it but you did in fact just contradict yourself.
If the zoo-like encounters with mulies at Glacier picnic areas is what you want in the ADK back country, then, yes, it's a contradiction.
Buckladd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2016, 12:18 PM   #129
Buckladd
Member
 
Buckladd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Hogtown
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by montcalm View Post
I'm not a hunter or angler... but I have to think of it from this perspective.

If I was living a somewhat simple, subsistence-based life as some do in more remote areas, the Adirondacks being a prime example in the east, I would hunt and eat meat. Why? There aren't exactly supermarkets everywhere and why put more strain on the rest of the world and their meat production industry (which don't even get me started) when you could eat the most natural meat known to man. Also it's just way, way cheaper.
Exactly, but there are so many reasons people hunt or fish. For me it is my family heritage and my earliest experiences outdoors were at streams, woods and deer camps. Hunting changed my life when I was a young person and maybe going in a questionable direction. I can't imagine not hunting or someone trying to control when and where I do it beyond current regulations.

As for the localvore thing, we like that too. My wife and I both enjoy venison, wild turkey and certain fish I bring home. I'll eat bear but she won't. But mostly we use venison as a supplement and a good one at that. We also share with our friends who don't hunt but like venison, and there are a lot of them. I've got a crockpot of venison chili going right now! I'm just about out of last year's supply; just in time for the upcoming deer season.
Buckladd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2016, 02:29 PM   #130
Gman
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Standing in a stream waving a stick
Posts: 1,009
So you still have Venison left from last season...almost a year. Way too long for this guy.

Every year I do a bass trip in late June with a bunch of guys. Every year I smoke a brisket, some ribs and chicken. One guy brings a bunch of frozen venison and every year the hunters all go: Mmmm I'm really looking forward to a feed of venison. Well every year we're stuck with an uneaten heaping platter of venison. It gets wrapped up and someone says I'll take it home but I bet it ends up in the garbage. Makes you wonder what the deer died for.
__________________
Izaak Walton a great writer? He can't even spell COMPLETE.
Gman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2016, 02:50 PM   #131
montcalm
Mobster
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 696
Interesting. I don't eat it anymore, but I recall when I was kid we'd eat venison all year round. We'd also eat pork too and I'm sure we didn't have pigs butchered more than once a year.

I do recall there was an order in which you wanted to eat things. I think towards the end it was all ground and stew meat.
montcalm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2016, 03:20 PM   #132
Buckladd
Member
 
Buckladd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Hogtown
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gman View Post
So you still have Venison left from last season...almost a year. Way too long for this guy.

Every year I do a bass trip in late June with a bunch of guys. Every year I smoke a brisket, some ribs and chicken. One guy brings a bunch of frozen venison and every year the hunters all go: Mmmm I'm really looking forward to a feed of venison. Well every year we're stuck with an uneaten heaping platter of venison. It gets wrapped up and someone says I'll take it home but I bet it ends up in the garbage. Makes you wonder what the deer died for.
The benefits of a food saver/vacuum seal. We eat it like crazy during the hunting season when it's fresh, then we back off during the holidays. I always save some for ice fishing and summer camping trips. That is, assuming we have a good year. We also make venison cube steaks, which are incredible. Venison is much better for you than beef and the deer I hunt are mostly living off what they eat in the mountains. It's the best, in my opinion.
Buckladd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2016, 04:19 PM   #133
Neil
Kayak-46
 
Neil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by forest dweller View Post

Combine the two, animals accidentally killed by cars and animals deliberately killed by people and it is probably an unacceptable amount...to people that don't like animals being killed.
I would bet that parasites, predators, starvation and the elements kill way more wildlife than hunters and cars put together.

For gosh sakes Forest Dweller, take a chill pill lest forum history repeat
itself.
__________________
The best, the most successful adventurer, is the one having the most fun.
Neil is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2016, 07:01 PM   #134
poconoron
Backcountry Wanderer
 
poconoron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pocono Mts, Pa. and Adirondacks
Posts: 786
I respectfully submit that legal hunting is not a prominent issue in considering wildlife numbers in the ADKs. In the Pocono region of Pennsylvania, we have more deer, bears, and turkeys than you can shake a stick at, as well as a bountiful load of hunters each year.

The more telling factor is what the local habitat can support. We have tons of acorns for wildlife, for example, and not nearly the harsh winters that deep freeze the ADKs for months on end.

Illegal hunting, though, may be another story especially when done over baited stands.
__________________
Ahh............Wilderness.......
poconoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2016, 10:51 PM   #135
forest dweller
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil View Post
I would bet that parasites, predators, starvation and the elements kill way more wildlife than hunters and cars put together.
Then they have to deal with that in addition to hunters and automobiles.

Last edited by Neil; 09-30-2016 at 06:47 AM..
forest dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2016, 03:08 PM   #136
Buckladd
Member
 
Buckladd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Hogtown
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by poconoron View Post
I respectfully submit that legal hunting is not a prominent issue in considering wildlife numbers in the ADKs. In the Pocono region of Pennsylvania, we have more deer, bears, and turkeys than you can shake a stick at, as well as a bountiful load of hunters each year.

The more telling factor is what the local habitat can support. We have tons of acorns for wildlife, for example, and not nearly the harsh winters that deep freeze the ADKs for months on end.

Illegal hunting, though, may be another story especially when done over baited stands.
Most illegal hunting such as baiting, jacking and hunting out of season are done in areas that are easily accessible. The participants are not considered hunters, just takers. I agree it is a problem and pretty much always has been. It would be a much bigger one if legal hunting ceased to exist. These days fish and wildlife agencies don't manage wildlife, they manage people.
Buckladd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2016, 01:17 AM   #137
Schultzz
Low Impact Skidder
 
Schultzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 676
I know some Native Americans (Indians) who hunt deer year round. I have pulled several deer out for them with my quad. (They don't hunt within the Blue Line). That's the way they were raised and they use pretty much the whole deer. They make crafts and gifts from the animal but the meat, they eat. I wouldn't say they hunt only on the rez, but they see nothing wrong with that.
__________________
Never Argue With An Idiot. They Will Drag You Down To Their Level And Beat You With Experience.
Schultzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2016, 07:40 AM   #138
yayabrazie
Yayabrazie
 
yayabrazie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Paul Smiths
Posts: 53
When I was working with the forest rangers they said that the moose abundant moose population was located in Franklin County. This was up near Gold Smith Rd on your way to Plattsburg from Saranac Lake. If you ever go that way I would highly recommend going down this road.
Ive seen moose tracks almost every time. My first moose sighting was in Paul Smiths of May 2015.

You want to see a bear? I would recommend the Whitney Wilderness area (Last time I saw them there was Thanksgiving). Or Old Forge
yayabrazie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2016, 10:34 AM   #139
poconoron
Backcountry Wanderer
 
poconoron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pocono Mts, Pa. and Adirondacks
Posts: 786
I've seen moose tracks in the Perkins clearing area above Speculator nearly every time I've been there.
__________________
Ahh............Wilderness.......
poconoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

DISCLAIMER: Use of these forums, and information found herein, is at your own risk. Use of this site by members and non-members alike is only granted by the adkhighpeak.com administration provided the terms and conditions found in the FULL DISCLAIMER have been read. Continued use of this site implies that you have read, understood and agree to the terms and conditions of this site. Any questions can be directed to the Administrator of this site.