Hawk, in case you missed it, I was making the point that people should tone down the rhetoric and stop casting aspersions on the character and motives of the various parties to this matter. In this situation, just like any other, it is easy to vilify the other side if one wants to light the torch of indignation and outrage.
I'm having a tough time making sense of your overall position. Here you seem to be forcefully arguing for due process:
Yet in the same post and elsewhere you make it all but clear that Hon. Redhawk has already ruled, and the property owners are guilty.
What's it going to be? Respect for due process and finding out what the law actually is, or maintaining that the property owners are guilty until proven innocent, at which point if and when that happens we'll probably hear a lot about the "miscarriage of justice"?
I'm having a tough time making sense of your overall position. Here you seem to be forcefully arguing for due process:
Originally posted by redhawk
View Post
Originally posted by redhawk
View Post
Comment